This particular approach may work out, may be the game changer. Or not. It may be that the actual details of the technical outcomes and advances are no more important than the changes that articles and discussion like this make to filters, biases, paradigms, investments, challenges ... to status quo, focus, inspiration, etc.

The 1962 book “The Theory of Scientific Revolutions” by Thomas S. Kunz takes on this “relativistic” idea. With a PhD in Physics from Harvard it is no surprise he quickly became a darling for Social Sciences academia (and even business) but caught heat from “normal science”. It may be that this idea is not an “either / or” condition. It may be that it wasn’t completely necessary to move Kunz to the Philosophy Department.