Kat we could be in a multi universe and soup like you describe. We could be in a simple base reality. And, the unknown like pi is infinite, our scant known is a 10 foot pier into the an infinite ocean of unknown. We do know that remote viewers both in time and space produce results that while too inconsistent to deem usable as an assumption for modeling are too consistent to discard as superstitious fabrication. Philosophy, what we are doing in this discussion, is the queen to the natural sciences — we would not have math, astronomy, chemistry, biology, physics or the associated engineering practices if not for speculation and using concepts of reasoning, exploration and logic. A model is not reality, the model is an abstract concept for representing the phenomenon occurring. We don’t have repeatable observable results for what you do to have that have the consistency to form a reliable model (yet). But I believe we will and I suspect it will be classic scientists working on the properties of energy that will provide more guidance on what is actually happening.